tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30971820.post4513156364336655276..comments2008-07-10T17:02:27.591+08:00Lim Leng Hionghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05426898630563791849noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30971820.post-8224344213569679722008-07-10T17:02:00.000+08:002008-07-10T17:02:00.000+08:00To Daniel:<BR/><BR/>Welcome to Fresh Brainz!<BR/><BR/>Actually "Laws" are not necessarily better or more accurate compared to "Theories". For example, Einstein's Theory of Relativity is more accurate than Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation.<BR/><BR/>So I would categorize them like this:<BR/><BR/>Law ~ Theory >> Hypothesis<BR/><BR/>As for intelligent design, it doesn't generate any testable predictions (since in principle an omni-everything deity can do whatever she wants) so it can't be a hypothesis.Lim Leng Hionghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05426898630563791849noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30971820.post-21006341924860940722008-07-10T09:34:00.000+08:002008-07-10T09:34:00.000+08:00Law > Theory > Hypothesis That's how I like to categorize them ;)<BR/>I probably put intelligent design somewhere in the hypothesis bracket.Danielnoreply@blogger.com